
Product Review: No Name Refractometers
Beware of cheap "no name” refractometers (and their distributors). These tools may not be suitable for gem identification. Read our review to learn more.
2 Minute Read
Initial Impressions of No Name Refractometers
When I opened the package, one difference was apparent immediately. The “no name” instrument was much smaller than my GIA Duplex II refractometer. (See the photo above for a comparison). The hemisphere, lens, and light opening were less than half the size of the GIA unit. I expected this would cause problems. However, once I started my tests this turned out not to be the case.
The Good
First, I tested a number of identified faceted gems with established refractive indices (RI). To my surprise, I found the “no name” unit much easier to use than the larger Duplex II. The smaller hemisphere creates a smaller viewing area. Thus, the stone is centered automatically in the magnifying lens.
Compared to the Duplex II, this was a delight. With it, I usually start with the magnifying lens off. I get my head in the proper position to view the shadow and then replace the lens. With the smaller refractometer, all this was unnecessary.
The Bad
Next, I tried doing some spot readings on cabochons. Here, the smaller and lower magnification lens really fell short. Getting an accurate spot reading from this little instrument proved…
Related Articles
What Happened to the GIA GemSet Color and Hue Wheel?
Product Review: Duplex II and Rayner Dialdex Refractometers
Refractometer Guide, Part 2: Cabochon Testing
Polariscope Guide, Part 3: Testing for Gemstone Twinning, Dichroism, and Crystal Strain
Latest Articles
Milarite Value, Price, and Jewelry Information
Appraising Pearls: How to Grade Pearls
Agate Buying Guide
Carving Techniques for Handling Inclusions in Transparent Gems
Never Stop Learning
When you join the IGS community, you get trusted diamond & gemstone information when you need it.